« Women, men, and Clinton | Main | Next for Reid »

July 18, 2007

Loose interpretations

The real picture:
Picture_25















And as the Wall Street Journal might present it:

Picture_5

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515fa669e200e00995a2008833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Loose interpretations:

Comments

Careful Brian, you'll get the WSJ Ed. Board all weepy and shrill. All they have to is whisper 'get him', and the whole wingnut brigade from NRO to AIPAC to LGF will be on your ass.

Come on, give them a little more credit for obfuscation skill.

A REAL WSJ editor would have cropped the first 160/170 to show the trend starting at 180/month.

Nice chart. What's the source of the stats, though?

Great post!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment