« Women, men, and Clinton | Main | Next for Reid »
The real picture:
And as the Wall Street Journal might present it:
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/642450/20149570
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Loose interpretations:
Careful Brian, you'll get the WSJ Ed. Board all weepy and shrill. All they have to is whisper 'get him', and the whole wingnut brigade from NRO to AIPAC to LGF will be on your ass.
Posted by: JimPortlandOR | July 18, 2007 at 08:11 PM
Come on, give them a little more credit for obfuscation skill.
A REAL WSJ editor would have cropped the first 160/170 to show the trend starting at 180/month.
Posted by: claude | July 19, 2007 at 09:36 AM
Nice chart. What's the source of the stats, though?
Posted by: balisardo | July 19, 2007 at 11:36 AM
Great post!
Posted by: Michael Corcoran | July 21, 2007 at 12:45 AM
Name:
Email Address: (Not displayed with comment.)
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments:
Careful Brian, you'll get the WSJ Ed. Board all weepy and shrill. All they have to is whisper 'get him', and the whole wingnut brigade from NRO to AIPAC to LGF will be on your ass.
Posted by: JimPortlandOR | July 18, 2007 at 08:11 PM
Come on, give them a little more credit for obfuscation skill.
A REAL WSJ editor would have cropped the first 160/170 to show the trend starting at 180/month.
Posted by: claude | July 19, 2007 at 09:36 AM
Nice chart. What's the source of the stats, though?
Posted by: balisardo | July 19, 2007 at 11:36 AM
Great post!
Posted by: Michael Corcoran | July 21, 2007 at 12:45 AM